|
|
Biodiversity
- ISSN 1488-8386 a subscription
based quarterly journal
|
CONTRIBUTIONS
(review of first three issues): |
The first
issue of Biodiversity was published in January
2000, the second in May, and the third in August. The final
issue in the first volume will be published in November and
is well under way. To the present time, Biodiversity
has contributed information in the following areas:
agricultural practices in relation to the integrity of
biodiversity and environment; efforts in conservation of
forest ecosystems, and understanding of selected life forms
regarding their life history, state of being, and their
functions, usefulness as food or medicinal sources (Coffee,
Pineapple, Seahorses, Spiders, Whale Shark, Hamilton's
Frog...):
1. January 2000 - Biodiversity 1(1):
In developing and developed
countries, small-scale farmers and peasants have fed much of
the world for numberless centuries. They have used
traditional varieties which undergo continuing selection and
are adapted to the type of land and local climate, soils,
drought cycles, etc. The diversity of these varieties helps
protect them against diseases and pests. They are free to
replant their own seeds and exchange them with their
neighbours without charge. This system is sustainable - or
they would not be there. They used local organic fertilizers
and biological approaches to pest control. So the off-site
impact of this kind of farming on human and wildlife health
was minimal. This is not to paint a picture of a dream-like
perfection. There were problems, but these could often be
met by due attention of working together with their
neighbours and their governments and their agencies.

These farmers are now being squeezed off the land by
powerful economic forces in favour of industrial style
farming. Crops are now patented or consist of hybrid
varieties so that the resultant seeds cannot be replanted.
The varieties have costly fertilizer inputs beyond the reach
of most small farmers. Pesticides either have to be sprayed
on them (and they may be genetically adapted to a single
pesticide brand) or are built into them. The varieties are
used over large areas of landscapes. This means that this
paradigm is not sustainable in the long run, is harmful to
human and wildlife health, is costly, and is not affordable
by the small-scale farmer. Moreover, the seeds and
pesticides are the purview of transnational corporations,
meaning profit is siphoned out of the country.
Next>>>
|
|
|
|
|